Which are...?Berdal wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2026 6:04 am to implement or adopt game improvements, features, and changes that WoW Forever gets right.
Personally I really like the priest discipline tree with the focus on shielding/crit healing. I think, if done right, on octo you could keep the current dps spec and also implement this type of healer/support spec where you can choose one of thos specs depending where you put the points in the disciplin tree.
God, if this is going to be the new wave of suggestions I'm gonna throw up tbh.Cookieguy wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2026 7:17 pmPersonally I really like the priest discipline tree with the focus on shielding/crit healing. I think, if done right, on octo you could keep the current dps spec and also implement this type of healer/support spec where you can choose one of thos specs depending where you put the points in the disciplin tree.
I have made suggestions to a disci priest rework/improvement weeks ago, in particular pointing out that it has 0 identity beside "I crit I procc" with vastly lacking in the dps support department which it looked like it was initialy designed towards. Also shields are mostly useless in dungeons/raids outside of some rare use cases and the talent points you could invest in the current shield talents are just wasted in any spec (maybe only in pvp it's may be somewhat used I guess).Defiant wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2026 10:38 pmGod, if this is going to be the new wave of suggestions I'm gonna throw up tbh.Cookieguy wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2026 7:17 pm
Personally I really like the priest discipline tree with the focus on shielding/crit healing. I think, if done right, on octo you could keep the current dps spec and also implement this type of healer/support spec where you can choose one of thos specs depending where you put the points in the disciplin tree.
"Let's make massive balance changes based on untested concepts presented by modern WoW."
Can you really say nothing looked nice to you?Defiant wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2026 10:38 pmGod, if this is going to be the new wave of suggestions I'm gonna throw up tbh.Cookieguy wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2026 7:17 pm Personally I really like the priest discipline tree with the focus on shielding/crit healing. I think, if done right, on octo you could keep the current dps spec and also implement this type of healer/support spec where you can choose one of thos specs depending where you put the points in the disciplin tree.
"Let's make massive balance changes based on untested concepts presented by modern WoW."
Leave him be. Don't feed the troll.Cookieguy wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2026 6:31 am I have made suggestions to a disci priest rework/improvement weeks ago, in particular pointing out that it has 0 identity beside "I crit I procc" with vastly lacking in the dps support department which it looked like it was initialy designed towards. Also shields are mostly useless in dungeons/raids outside of some rare use cases and the talent points you could invest in the current shield talents are just wasted in any spec (maybe only in pvp it's may be somewhat used I guess).
But god forbid someone is making a suggestion to improve a lackluster spec or introduce playstyle variety.
Also "presented by modern WoW", shielding priest was a thing in WotLK unless you cout that as "modern WoW", and of course it should be balanced/adjusted towards our octo version.
I can really say nothing looked nice to me so let's cut the ambiguity and you just tell us what you want from Forever so we don't waste our time arguing about Forsaken Paladins and Sky Elves...Berdal wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2026 7:23 am
Can you really say nothing looked nice to you?
I agree that Blizzard is officially a shithole and everything they touch turn to shit. But to say nothing they are adding to WoW Forever seems like a good idea is certified crazy tall...
I'm sure we all have different opinions (and some people's are unfortunately tainted by the fact they're associated Blizz), but one I think would have broad support would be the expanded on Campsites.
Yes? The entire thing struck me as modern Disney tier slop. I want nothing to do with any of it. Now if they had talked about Tauren Paladins I would feel differently.
I don't often agree with this guy but yeah, what he said.Octosaur wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2026 6:29 pmI can really say nothing looked nice to me so let's cut the ambiguity and you just tell us what you want from Forever so we don't waste our time arguing about Forsaken Paladins and Sky Elves...Berdal wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2026 7:23 am
Can you really say nothing looked nice to you?
I agree that Blizzard is officially a shithole and everything they touch turn to shit. But to say nothing they are adding to WoW Forever seems like a good idea is certified crazy tall...
I'm sure we all have different opinions (and some people's are unfortunately tainted by the fact they're associated Blizz), but one I think would have broad support would be the expanded on Campsites.
No, not from the trailers and the blizzcon panels.
For one, hopefully we'll port to UE5 in the near future. Then HD switch choosing your own graphics (+ mobile support). Also Transmog toggle is indisputable BiS.Rathotdog wrote: Fri Sep 18, 2026 9:18 pmNo, not from the trailers and the blizzcon panels.
I am sure there are some small details, maybe a good questline or a cool new zone expansion, that would fit into Mysteries of Azeroth, but who cares, really.
What exactly did YOU think would fit well into MoA?
The closest I was to thinking "hm that would be cool in MoA" were the Riverglades, but the zone doesn't fit the Classic Artstyle, it's too modern. And we haven't even seen the story of the zone.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest