Kestrel wrote: Sat Aug 01, 2026 7:45 am
Unfortunately often when political conversations break out, it is necessary to find the exact line that they cross into "political" and that can be very difficult to standardize. As a result some moderators and GM's may be slightly different in where they draw the line while we work to get on the same page.
In addition to that it also can take a minute to cross that line and that line has to be drawn somewhere. In general if you type out a message in world chat that specifically mentions political parties in a way that is central to the conversation, or the same for religions or other banned topics, I would recommend rethinking before sending it to world and instead send it to a discord or guild chat ect
Thanks for the response. I understand there's a line to be drawn and it can be confusing sometimes, but simply referring to a political ideology/simple adjective like 'conservative' in a cheeky comment about the philosophy behind empathy does not count, in my mind, as "political discussion". Again, I agree with those rules and I've seen their benefit many times in world chat when shit-flinging about the news or politics starts. I just think it's within the set of skills a GM should have to read the room and not interpret rules so literally as to be toxic - and like I said, GMs gloating about handing out mutes is in very bad taste. This GM said something like "bat is getting a real workout today" after muting me and I assume some others for an hour. We were having a grand old time just shooting the shit in world chat before that happened.
I also found it funny that the mute didn't come when I said that statement but a few minutes later when I made the comment about politics breaking the rules. I assume that set him off and so I was punished for that with the message in the screenshot as justification.
Regardless, it's water under the bridge now and I feel my message got through; thank you.