OctoWow - Forums

Both my case and other bans (such as "Freezz") use the exact same logic: claiming a boost starting specifically from level 46 and taking place over a 4-day period.
Nobody pays for a boosting service that starts randomly at level 46 to reach 56 or 60
Categorizing standard mid-level solo progression (46 to 56) as a paid boost under this exact 46-to-X, 4-day pattern points to a fundamental error in how my account was flagged.
My account was never shared, and I did not use any boosting service. Please re-examine my account to resolve this mistake.

I don’t mean to imply anything, but you were told the time period in question. Along with a request to explain where you were online during that time.

I think that’s more effective than a face-to-face meeting .

My dear, I'm going to post it anyway. I can't share my private information here, and it says there's concrete, clear evidence; I want to see it.

Who are you Rec? Why are you here, demanding information. If you dont want to imply anything simply back off and stop larping as a GM.

Don't read too much into my post.
I'm here because I'm interested in the topic, and as I already mentioned in my other post, the process, as it stands now, can be very prone to abuse.

Pritty sure for rmt bans there aint proof of actual rmt, just account activiy they dont like. Rules need to be updated, instead of banning people doing stuff in the grey area and just gotta wonder if allowd or not.
Tdlr i asked ifi could lvl 1-60 for someone and got awnser adviced not to for reasons, while account sharing is allowd ??

Knifewrench wrote: Thu Sep 03, 2026 6:21 am Pritty sure for rmt bans there aint proof of actual rmt, just account activiy they dont like. Rules need to be updated, instead of banning people doing stuff in the grey area and just gotta wonder if allowd or not.
Tdlr i asked ifi could lvl 1-60 for someone and got awnser adviced not to for reasons, while account sharing is allowd ??

I'm fine with banning in grey area. Why nice players should go to grey? This is already an attempt to dodge around, so ban in grey and maybe unban or maybe not. Ban appeal are PUBLIC, so community can also say own word. And if some guys like Rec asking for something at PUBLIC forum with PUBLIC appeal - you can answer or not. But again - it's PUBLIC appeal. You read rules, you agree with it, you playing here. You read rules, you didn't agree with it, you going to find other project which rules, if we take it more deeply, whose attitude to atmosphere in community corresponds to your expectations.

There's nothing to ban here; we stand by these guys during the DDoS attack. Remove this ban before they do anything ridiculous.

Rec wrote: Wed Sep 02, 2026 5:57 pm I don’t mean to imply anything, but you were told the time period in question. Along with a request to explain where you were online during that time.

I think that’s more effective than a face-to-face meeting .

No, he will create several topic, will call Kestrel as "COME TO ME FACE TO FACE" (there remains to be written "you succer" to be sure to be enough cool and more innocent), but will use only one proof "my guild can say". Lol ofc, guild will defend you. I was in HC guild which use multiboxing for lvling and everyone covered for each other.

We are not a characterless guild like you; they cannot provide any concrete evidence.