Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
SamandClaude Fable 5 6b980b9efb the player build: one binary that carries its content
- a player build ships beside the dev one — dev chords and probe surfaces go dark, and a gate enforces what a player can still reach, by medium not by module
- the binary carries its own shaders and its shipped UI, finds the WoW folder by itself, and keeps its local state in one benilla-config folder
- the glue screens get a capture shutter, and the engine stops depending on the protocol crate

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 18:18:02 +07:00
SamandClaude Fable 5 d00912edd0 crowded dungeons back to 60 fps: two per-NPC costs collapse
- The dungeon framerate reports were right about the mechanism: the cost is
  CPU-side and it scales with NPC count, not with what's drawn. Two per-unit
  lanes were each 30–100x more expensive than the work they do. Measured at the
  reported Lower Blackrock Spire spot: 29.7 ms/frame, 72 CPU ms, before.
- "Which room is this NPC in" scanned whole dungeon groups triangle by
  triangle — a spire stacks several 15k-face groups into any vertical column,
  so 37 moving NPCs cost 1.2 million triangle tests per frame. Each group's
  faces now sit in a column index built at load; same verdicts (pinned by
  exactness tests), 88k tests, the lane drops from 11.3 ms to 1.1 ms.
- Animating one creature cost ~190 microseconds per frame in generic per-bone
  animation machinery — hash lookups and boxed curves per bone, mostly to
  produce constants. A direct pose evaluator now does the same math into the
  same joints for ~16 microseconds per rig, checked bone-for-bone against the
  old output across crossfades, overlays and masks. The reference animates
  every in-range unit with no view cull, and now so can we: a raid's worth of
  animating rigs (~450) costs ~4 CPU ms where it used to cost ~85.
- Net at the reported spot: a flat 60 fps. The performance probes also learned
  to report CPU work (ms and %) instead of wall-clock fps, which is what makes
  these numbers repeatable on a busy machine — and comparable to the Mac
  report's own units.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-27 19:38:22 +07:00