Not a gap: a defect. Defining `UnitXP` at all is what makes
SuperCleveRoidMacros believe the whole family is present —
`hasUnitXP = pcall(UnitXP, "nop", "nop")` (`Init.lua:274`), which
succeeds here because the dispatcher's fall-through does not raise — so
four macro conditionals have been running against commands this client
did not implement: `[insight]`, `[noinsight]`, `[behind]`, `[nobehind]`,
each with a count mode too.
The fall-through answers the stock `UnitXP(unit)` getter's 0, and every
one of those conditionals compares against `true` LITERALLY (`== true`,
`~= true`). So `[insight]` and `[behind]` could never fire while
`[noinsight]` and `[nobehind]` always did, with nothing to notice it by.
That is why both commands answer a boolean rather than 1.12's `1`/nil
flag shape, and why a pair they cannot measure answers nil rather than a
fabricated `false`: the two directions are read separately, so "cannot
say" has to be distinguishable from "no".
`inSight`'s blocker is gone, and it was gone before this: the row said
"needs a real raycast with no current binding-layer access", and the
nameplate-occlusion work built exactly that raycast. This is the same
body-layer ray from the player's chest instead of the camera's eye, fed
into the per-token `UnitReach` record `distanceBetween` already reads —
only the app can trace the world, which is the whole reason the command
sat blocked in the binding.
`behind` this file called *unconfirmed* ("treat as unconfirmed until seen
elsewhere"). It is now seen elsewhere: ten call sites, with the argument
order documented by its own readers, so `behind(A, B)` asks whether A
stands in B's rear arc. The arc is the rear HEMISPHERE, which is what
this realm's server means by behind — vmangos tests `!HasInArc(M_PI,
attacker)`, the same rule that accepts or refuses Backstab — taken flat,
so a ledge above a mob's back counts and directly overhead does not.
Two things my own tests caught, both worth keeping:
- A two-argument `inSight` answered `true`. These are recognised
commands, so they now match on the NAME alone and say nil when the
arguments make no pair; the arity fall-through is right for an
unrecognised command and wrong here, because neither name is a unit
token so the stock getter can only answer a meaningless 0 — which is
truthy in Lua, i.e. a confident "yes, in sight".
- A `#[cfg(test)]` module placed mid-file hid every `fire_event` after it
from `event_shape_gate`, which truncates each file at the first one:
six unit-field bridge events read as unproduced. The test moved to the
file's own tests module, where the one-test-module-per-file convention
that gate assumes puts it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SgstFWtn1RxEJ5kVrpgYwn
gromandClaude Opus 5
38a6b6f149