Sam SungandClaude Opus 5.5 036e3d0240 Comments in the UI XML and the Lua fork's manifest: no dead marker, no record number (#300) ...

Fixes #31. The last comments outside the Rust sources that carried a dead name or a private record number:

- `OptionsFrame.xml` and `SpellBookAdapters.xml` drop the `BENILLA_ALLOW_OWN_UI=1` marker, which no code or test reads.
- `third_party/lua-src/Cargo.toml` says why the fork exists without its record number, in plain case.

Comment text only: every file is identical with its comments stripped. The Rust test comments #31 also listed were rewritten with their crates' comment passes.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-09-25 17:09:35 +07:00

..

lua-5.1.5

the reference tables, the install guard and the vendored forks stop naming the maintainer's analysis

2026-09-23 18:47:48 +07:00

src

hotfix: the lua-src fork ships, and the build resolves again

2026-08-11 19:11:22 +07:00

BENILLA.md

the reference tables, the install guard and the vendored forks stop naming the maintainer's analysis

2026-09-23 18:47:48 +07:00

Cargo.toml

Comments in the UI XML and the Lua fork's manifest: no dead marker, no record number (#300)

2026-09-25 17:09:35 +07:00

LICENSE

hotfix: the lua-src fork ships, and the build resolves again

2026-08-11 19:11:22 +07:00