What the fuck are you talking about? I wasn’t in the voice channel. Who were you talking to there, my ghost?Redhotcc wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2026 1:35 am So you think telling him over VC and in game isn't enough? ok bro, nice rage bait lol
Ninja loot
Re: Ninja loot
-
Bootybaker
- Posts: 9
Re: Ninja loot
I see very little value in extending this discussion any further, so i will address the point that actually matters and leave it there.
The Scythe should have been HRed on SR sheet. It was not and the communication should have been clearer. Those are fair criticism and we will address them.
What does not follow from that is the accusation of deliberate ninja or favouritism. A procedural mistake is not an evidence of bad faith and repeating an allegation does not turn it into a proof.
The GMs reviewed the matter, decided to not interfere in an internal guild loot decision and provided sensible ways to avoid such situation in future. We will take that on board.
Beyond that the discussion has moved away from the original issue and turned into personal remarks, unrelated grievances and speculations about anyone motives. None of that address the actual point of this topic. Continuing like this will only make things worse for everyone involved and will not lead into any useful outcome.
The facts, logs and GM response are all there, so everyone can make up their own mind. I don't think there is anything useful left to be added.
As far as im concerned the matter is closed. I would suggest to lock this topic to avoid any further unnecessary damage to anyone invloved.
The Scythe should have been HRed on SR sheet. It was not and the communication should have been clearer. Those are fair criticism and we will address them.
What does not follow from that is the accusation of deliberate ninja or favouritism. A procedural mistake is not an evidence of bad faith and repeating an allegation does not turn it into a proof.
The GMs reviewed the matter, decided to not interfere in an internal guild loot decision and provided sensible ways to avoid such situation in future. We will take that on board.
Beyond that the discussion has moved away from the original issue and turned into personal remarks, unrelated grievances and speculations about anyone motives. None of that address the actual point of this topic. Continuing like this will only make things worse for everyone involved and will not lead into any useful outcome.
The facts, logs and GM response are all there, so everyone can make up their own mind. I don't think there is anything useful left to be added.
As far as im concerned the matter is closed. I would suggest to lock this topic to avoid any further unnecessary damage to anyone invloved.
"It’s like putting banana in front of monkey and telling it’s optional to eat it" - Danuvius
Sons of Mukla / Watch Yourself / OKEAH - Orgrimmar raid - Tel'Abim Turtle WoW
Sons of Mukla / Watch Yourself / OKEAH - Orgrimmar raid - Tel'Abim Turtle WoW
Re: Ninja loot
idk man, not joining voice on a guild run is like... ya. But clearly we won't agree. Decision was made. Best to close topic like mentioned.
Re: Ninja loot
1. Even PUGs can clear K10 without voice.Redhotcc wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2026 1:36 pm idk man, not joining voice on a guild run is like... ya. But clearly we won't agree. Decision was made. Best to close topic like mentioned.
2. I didn't even notice you guys were there.
3. So are you saying that while you guys were talking to the imaginary me in voice chat, nobody noticed that I wasn't even there?
Re: Ninja loot
Locking as this feels it what will be worked out has been.
Sincerely,
Kestrel
Your Temporary Part Time Community Manager - Full Time Developer
Kestrel
Your Temporary Part Time Community Manager - Full Time Developer