It's also not the best response for the community that just wants to play. These private servers are about preserving the game for players to enjoy and DDoS attacks directly contradict that effort. Whichever server is DDoSing OctoWoW are no different from Blizzard.Sypheline wrote: Wed Sep 09, 2026 7:01 am I would also add for Octowow, financing the ddos protection is no problem. I personally donated this month enough to cover their expense for September.
We are going to be fine, once a protection service is established.
Should an attempt be made, the best way to handle this is to stop at the identification of the attacker, perhaps making it public information.
Doing another ddos in revenge isnt to the benefit of octowow, as the best revenge is prosperity.
What's all the pedo talk lolTerribletank wrote: Fri Sep 04, 2026 11:59 pm There is no playerbase on Raven, max online is about 550, unique ips about 1/3 of that, average player count is 100-150 at best. There are 3 pedo guilds there, and about 1/2 of that 100-150 online are pedos. The raven project failed miserably on week one; at that, most of the player base also have accounts here. As for Cappy, the bulk of the playerbase are CN.
It most certainly comes from "somewhere"; though the real question is how could you possible not know?Rathotdog wrote: Wed Sep 09, 2026 8:25 pmWhat's all the pedo talk lolTerribletank wrote: Fri Sep 04, 2026 11:59 pm There is no playerbase on Raven, max online is about 550, unique ips about 1/3 of that, average player count is 100-150 at best. There are 3 pedo guilds there, and about 1/2 of that 100-150 online are pedos. The raven project failed miserably on week one; at that, most of the player base also have accounts here. As for Cappy, the bulk of the playerbase are CN.
mind you, I find it funny to call them pedos with or without proof, but it had to come from somewhere, right?
Users browsing this forum: Holis, Maaadcheddarrr, Xiriah and 1 guest