Open World Boosting

Ideas for new content, features, and balance changes.

Poll: How should open world boosting be treated (on the non-hardcore servers)

Poll ended at Tue Jul 21, 2026 7:08 am

Leave it as is.
144
67%
A mechanic that magically removes level 60 mob tag boosting would be great assuming no side affects.
71
33%
Total votes: 215

Brighteous
Posts: 9

Re: Open World Boosting

Post#41 » Fri Jul 10, 2026 7:36 am

Keep hardcore HARDCORE! No boosting for people using challenges! I'm not impressed by your guild or your alts if they're all boosted. Play the game!

Dartek128
Posts: 1

Re: Open World Boosting

Post#42 » Fri Jul 10, 2026 7:55 am

It is very unclear what are we voting for?
apparently recently the boosting rules have been reverted, meaning ppl are allowed to use lvl 60 charracters to rush thru quests and boost their alts like that.
So if we are voting "leave it as it is" are we actually voting for that, or are we voting for no boosts at all?

Brighteous
Posts: 9

Re: Open World Boosting

Post#43 » Fri Jul 10, 2026 8:01 am

Harperhearts1 wrote: Tue Jul 07, 2026 9:41 am Finally trying to backup the claims about the majority being in favour of this change huh?
This early majority has no representation of the true server community's feelings. These are just the people who peruse the forums- who are more likely to be cynical elitists in progression guilds. Don't get cocky. Get people to come vote!

Shirokugirl
Posts: 1

Re: Open World Boosting

Post#44 » Fri Jul 10, 2026 8:05 am

As a leveler, whatever boosting is has not impacted my experience in the game. I loved turtle wow and I don't feel we need to be changing anything like this as I don't think it impacts me as the leveler. I think you should focus on those that are griefing others or doing actual RMT, but I support people playing the game how they want as long as it doesn't hurt others.

I don't trust Brighteous's campaign against this - it seems weird and I urge the voter to leave things as they are to keep things as close to Turtle's original design. Thanks.

Donmclarenson3
Posts: 1

Re: Open World Boosting

Post#45 » Fri Jul 10, 2026 9:30 am

Most poorly worded poll ever.

Xiv96
Posts: 15

Re: Open World Boosting

Post#46 » Sat Jul 11, 2026 6:45 pm

Shaksa wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2026 12:30 pm
Xiv96 wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2026 8:45 am Americans literally cannot accept that a majority disagrees with them.

Ofcourse the poll is skewed, as my opinion is the only one that matters!

Clown attitude.
You don't think people in favor of boosting are more likely to have multiple accounts?
Not to a measurable degree, no. You can cope however you like but the reality is that most people either want you to be able to self-boost or they simply do not care.

Shaksa
Posts: 17

Re: Open World Boosting

Post#47 » Sat Jul 11, 2026 9:34 pm

Xiv96 wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2026 6:45 pm
Shaksa wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2026 12:30 pm
Xiv96 wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2026 8:45 am Americans literally cannot accept that a majority disagrees with them.

Ofcourse the poll is skewed, as my opinion is the only one that matters!

Clown attitude.
You don't think people in favor of boosting are more likely to have multiple accounts?
Not to a measurable degree, no. You can cope however you like but the reality is that most people either want you to be able to self-boost or they simply do not care.
Self-boosting requires multiple accounts, right?

And each account gets one vote, right?

If that's the case, then players who self-boost can cast multiple votes, while also directly benefitting from the outcome of the poll.

Do you believe most peoples votes are at least partly influenced by self-interest?

If so, wouldn't it be reasonable to believe that a poll like this could be skewed?

Xiv96
Posts: 15

Re: Open World Boosting

Post#48 » Sat Jul 11, 2026 10:05 pm

Shaksa wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2026 9:34 pm
Xiv96 wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2026 6:45 pm
Shaksa wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2026 12:30 pm

You don't think people in favor of boosting are more likely to have multiple accounts?
Not to a measurable degree, no. You can cope however you like but the reality is that most people either want you to be able to self-boost or they simply do not care.
Self-boosting requires multiple accounts, right?

And each account gets one vote, right?

If that's the case, then players who self-boost can cast multiple votes, while also directly benefitting from the outcome of the poll.

Do you believe most peoples votes are at least partly influenced by self-interest?

If so, wouldn't it be reasonable to believe that a poll like this could be skewed?
Again, not to a measurable or substantial degree, NA brain.

Shaksa
Posts: 17

Re: Open World Boosting

Post#49 » Sat Jul 11, 2026 10:10 pm

Xiv96 wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2026 10:05 pm
Shaksa wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2026 9:34 pm
Xiv96 wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2026 6:45 pm

Not to a measurable degree, no. You can cope however you like but the reality is that most people either want you to be able to self-boost or they simply do not care.
Self-boosting requires multiple accounts, right?

And each account gets one vote, right?

If that's the case, then players who self-boost can cast multiple votes, while also directly benefitting from the outcome of the poll.

Do you believe most peoples votes are at least partly influenced by self-interest?

If so, wouldn't it be reasonable to believe that a poll like this could be skewed?
Again, not to a measurable or substantial degree, NA brain.
What makes you believe it would not be substantial?

Xiv96
Posts: 15

Re: Open World Boosting

Post#50 » Sun Jul 12, 2026 11:09 am

Shaksa wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2026 10:10 pm
Xiv96 wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2026 10:05 pm
Shaksa wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2026 9:34 pm

Self-boosting requires multiple accounts, right?

And each account gets one vote, right?

If that's the case, then players who self-boost can cast multiple votes, while also directly benefitting from the outcome of the poll.

Do you believe most peoples votes are at least partly influenced by self-interest?

If so, wouldn't it be reasonable to believe that a poll like this could be skewed?
Again, not to a measurable or substantial degree, NA brain.
What makes you believe it would not be substantial?
Because you have no credible proof pointing towards it being substantial.

And I'm sure the devs would invalidate the poll should a substantial part of the result be manipulated by votes originating from the same IPs, along with proof of said events - ofcourse.

The burden of proof ultimately is on you for making these claims and not on me to disprove your hearsay.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest