Rinlan

Appeal an account or character ban. Open a topic and a Game Master will review it.
Grimvus1
Posts: 1

Rinlan

Post#1 » Wed Sep 09, 2026 6:50 pm

Can I have a review of the ban on Rinlan, am fine to even have the account back only if tat is the only option.

Wubc
Posts: 49

Re: Rinlan

Post#2 » Wed Sep 09, 2026 7:19 pm

I'm a bit confused... Why would there be any option outside of:
a) The ban is correctly applied, it stays.
b) The ban was incorrectly applied and gets reversed entirely.

Looking for a third, in-between option suggests to me that you don't believe it's B...

Knifewrench
Posts: 400

Re: Rinlan

Post#3 » Thu Sep 10, 2026 4:47 am

Wubc wrote: Wed Sep 09, 2026 7:19 pm I'm a bit confused... Why would there be any option outside of:
a) The ban is correctly applied, it stays.
b) The ban was incorrectly applied and gets reversed entirely.

Looking for a third, in-between option suggests to me that you don't believe it's B...
Think he means just the acc back without chars on it. Instead of making a new account.

User avatar
Kestrel
Posts: 765

Re: Rinlan

Post#4 » Thu Sep 10, 2026 5:26 am

Banned for buying 30g. We may consider updating our banning protocols in the future to just soft delete/archive all characters on accounts found RMTing. This is not something we have time to do manually now though unfortunately.
Sincerely,
Kestrel
Your Temporary Part Time Community Manager - Full Time Developer

Wubc
Posts: 49

Re: Rinlan

Post#5 » Thu Sep 10, 2026 5:50 am

Kestrel wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2026 5:26 am Banned for buying 30g. We may consider updating our banning protocols in the future to just soft delete/archive all characters on accounts found RMTing. This is not something we have time to do manually now though unfortunately.
Seems like a lot of unnecessary work to me... Not much difference between that and just having them create a new account unless you wish to invite appeals of "well, my CharacterB wasn't involved so I should get to keep it", which would also mean more verification work required.

Keep it account level IMO. Deleting characters to free up names seems reasonable though.

Bonked
Posts: 2

Re: Rinlan

Post#6 » Fri Sep 11, 2026 9:35 am

Kestrel wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2026 5:26 am Banned for buying 30g. We may consider updating our banning protocols in the future to just soft delete/archive all characters on accounts found RMTing. This is not something we have time to do manually now though unfortunately.
If anything, you need to start IP banning goldbuyers and sellers... not become more lenient

User avatar
Mrsneed
Posts: 106

Re: Rinlan

Post#7 » Fri Sep 11, 2026 10:42 pm

Kestrel wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2026 5:26 am Banned for buying 30g. We may consider updating our banning protocols in the future to just soft delete/archive all characters on accounts found RMTing. This is not something we have time to do manually now though unfortunately.
Please do not become less strict.

User avatar
Terribletank
Posts: 27

Re: Rinlan

Post#8 » Fri Sep 11, 2026 11:29 pm

Kestrel wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2026 5:26 am Banned for buying 30g. We may consider updating our banning protocols in the future to just soft delete/archive all characters on accounts found RMTing. This is not something we have time to do manually now though unfortunately.
Ok i got to say it....

The polester idea....

This idea is the equivalent of the Guild GM who knows that the best method to progress is loot council, yet is worried as to the optics of what the guild will think of him when he distributes the loot to those who are most loyal, show up on time, show up with consumes, and always do their part.

A business (call it what you want but thats what this is) is not a democracy. You knew the right answer, you always knew the right answer, and you even loaded the question so as to obtain the right answer. Its your show, make your decisions; stop reaching out and begging sub-harambians to attempt to think.

**I fought a ballot measure initiative similar to this a year or so ago, went something like this: "Apples are really bad, they are sour, they rot, they steal bicycles, murder children, and eat dogs, would you like to vote to allow apple farming on public land?"

If you are sincere about wanting an honest opinion than don't load your questions. If folks exist in game with an IQ above 40, when they see a loaded question they know as a matter of fact that you were never sincerely seeking an honest answer.

Knifewrench
Posts: 400

Re: Rinlan

Post#9 » Thu Sep 17, 2026 9:57 am

Terribletank wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2026 11:29 pm
Kestrel wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2026 5:26 am Banned for buying 30g. We may consider updating our banning protocols in the future to just soft delete/archive all characters on accounts found RMTing. This is not something we have time to do manually now though unfortunately.
Ok i got to say it....

The polester idea....

This idea is the equivalent of the Guild GM who knows that the best method to progress is loot council, yet is worried as to the optics of what the guild will think of him when he distributes the loot to those who are most loyal, show up on time, show up with consumes, and always do their part.

A business (call it what you want but thats what this is) is not a democracy. You knew the right answer, you always knew the right answer, and you even loaded the question so as to obtain the right answer. Its your show, make your decisions; stop reaching out and begging sub-harambians to attempt to think.

**I fought a ballot measure initiative similar to this a year or so ago, went something like this: "Apples are really bad, they are sour, they rot, they steal bicycles, murder children, and eat dogs, would you like to vote to allow apple farming on public land?"

If you are sincere about wanting an honest opinion than don't load your questions. If folks exist in game with an IQ above 40, when they see a loaded question they know as a matter of fact that you were never sincerely seeking an honest answer.
having all chars deleted/suspended is basicly same as banning the account but its easyer to track the offender because his account has a previous flag. to me it sorta make sense to remove/suspend all chars on the account instead of blocking the account itself.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest