Ninja Looting is ALLOWED! (with proof) (confirmed by GM)

[Defiant]

I never once promoted needing on everything.

You can permanently need on anything and everything you want

[Burnett]

I never once promoted needing on everything.

You can permanently need on anything and everything you want

Okay, you're either ragebaiting or completely missing the point. I was obviously showing the problem with the rules given by the GM. If you need to take me out of context to prove a point, it just shows how wrong you are. I'll move on now.

[Defiant]

I never once promoted needing on everything.

You can permanently need on anything and everything you want

Okay, you're either ragebaiting or completely missing the point. I was obviously showing the problem with the rules given by the GM. If you need to take me out of context to prove a point, it just shows how wrong you are. I'll move on now.

So hit Need every time, unless someone says "don't ninja loot" and has a screenshot to back it up, because you are allowed!

[Uggerbugger]

Its a warrior that made the post he is freinds with the healer and mage and they all refused to continue the run after healer rudely needed on a item for not his spec and lost the roll, blacklist the whole shitter guild.
Warrior : spellhater
Healer paladin: cachorrito
Mage: tonkito

Blacklist people for a dispute over some lvl 30 loot? Do you go nuclear every time disagrees with your point of view?

[Reiker]

This is exactly the problem is it not? This means that every time you want to play a dungeon, you need to explicitly tell everyone that PROT PALADINS queing as DPS should not NEED on a mail int+spell power over the holy pala

Int and SP are primary stats for Prot paladins.

This is a good example of why GMs don't deal with these disputes though, they'd have to spend all their time explaining to people like Burnett that Mail Pants with Int & SP are indeed good for any Paladin spec.

[Knifewrench]

Its a warrior that made the post he is freinds with the healer and mage and they all refused to continue the run after healer rudely needed on a item for not his spec and lost the roll, blacklist the whole shitter guild.
Warrior : spellhater
Healer paladin: cachorrito
Mage: tonkito

Blacklist people for a dispute over some lvl 30 loot? Do you go nuclear every time disagrees with your point of view?

Nah blacklisted for skill issues.

[Knifewrench]

Its a warrior that made the post he is freinds with the healer and mage and they all refused to continue the run after healer rudely needed on a item for not his spec and lost the roll, blacklist the whole shitter guild.
Warrior : spellhater
Healer paladin: cachorrito
Mage: tonkito

Blacklist people for a dispute over some lvl 30 loot? Do you go nuclear every time disagrees with your point of view?

Also you support extorting people after they handed people mats to craft. So bugger off mr ugger.

[Uggerbugger]

Its a warrior that made the post he is freinds with the healer and mage and they all refused to continue the run after healer rudely needed on a item for not his spec and lost the roll, blacklist the whole shitter guild.
Warrior : spellhater
Healer paladin: cachorrito
Mage: tonkito

Blacklist people for a dispute over some lvl 30 loot? Do you go nuclear every time disagrees with your point of view?

Nah blacklisted for skill issues.

Clown.

[Knifewrench]

Blacklist people for a dispute over some lvl 30 loot? Do you go nuclear every time disagrees with your point of view?

Nah blacklisted for skill issues.

Clown.

Its not about the pants but how toxic they got for losing a roll on loot and tried frame someone for ninja looting+ false claims.

[Uggerbugger]

Its not about the pants but how toxic they got for losing a roll on loot and tried frame someone for ninja looting+ false claims.

The thing is, I actually agree with you about the pants. I do disagree with this immediate blacklist mentality, which I have also seen on Discord.

We do not have to "blacklist" someone because they make one mistake or because we disagree with them on one issue. I think the OP can clearly see by now that not everyone agrees with their point of view. The world is polarized enough as it is, we do not need to bring that into our playground, the place where we are supposed to have fun.

And its also about people in general. The OP might genuinely believe that this was ninja looting; they may honestly believe that to be a fact. You disagree, I disagree, and then hopefully they learn from the discussion and handle things differently next time.

If you see the same kind of post again and again from the same person, then by all means...

A side note is that I wish that forums where moderated, because I find the title of the post to be just plain wrong - ninja looting is not allowed when an agreement is correctly communicated before the start of an instance.